- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40736 WP No. 29786 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 29786 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KALAMMA W/O LATE PUTTASWAMYNAYAKA DEAD BY LRS 1(A) SRI. SANNASWAMY NAYAKA S/O. LATE PUTTASWAMYNAYAKA AND LATE KALAMMA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 1(B) SRI MADANAYAKA S/O. LATE PUTTASWAMYNAYAKA AND LATE KALAMMA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS PETITIONER NOS. 1(A) AND 1(B) R/AT HOSARAMENAHALLI VILLAGE BOLENAHALLI POST BILIKERE HOBLI HUNSUR TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT-571 105 1(C) SMT. CHANDRAMMA W/O. MR. BASAVARAJU D/O. LATE PUTTASWAMYNAYAKA AND LATE KALAMMA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT VALMIKI EXTENSION, K.R. NAGARA TOWN, MYSURU DISTRICT- 571 105. 1(D) SMT. GEETHA W/O. MR. YOGESHA D/O. LATE PUTTASWAMYNAYAKA Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40736 WP No. 29786 of 2025 AND LATE KALAMMA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT AANE KANNAMBADI VILLAGE MYSURU HOBLI HOLENARASIPURA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT- 573 211 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRAKASH K A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT.SIDDAMMA W/O. LATE KARINAYAKA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT HOSARAMENAHALLI VILLAGE BOLENAHALLI POST, BILIKERE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT- 571 105 2. SMT. NINGAJAMMA W/O. LATE DEVANAYAKA D/O. LATE KARINAYAKA AND LATE CHOWDAMMA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT HOSARAMENAHALLI VILLAGE, JANATHA COLONY, BOLENAHALLI POST, BILIKERE HOBLI, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571 105 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DTD 13.08.25 PASSED ON IA NO. VII IN O.S.NO.86/2009 UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(D) R/W. SECTION 151 OF C.P.C. BY THE LEARNED PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HUNSUR (ANNEXURE- G). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40736 WP No. 29786 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Objections raised by the registry are sustained. 2. The present writ petition is not maintainable. 3. The liberty is reserved to the petitioners to prefer an alternative remedy in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18