Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56614 (KAR)

M/S. PANCHAMUKY INVESTMENTS LIMITED v. M/S. DUO ASSOCIATES (BUILDERS) PRIVATE LIMITED

CRL.P/4268/2023 · 2025-08-11

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31076 CRL.P No. 4268 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4268 OF 2023 BETWEEN: M/S. PANCHAMUKY INVESTMENTS LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.54/28, K.S. GARDEN, 4TH CROSS LALBAGH ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI SANJAY GARG …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANUPAM AGARWAL, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. M/S. DUO ASSOCIATES (BUILDERS) PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.28, ULSOOR ROAD BENGALURU 560042 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTORS, SRI. A.M. SHARATH CHANDRA AND SRI. T. PHANI MAHESH 2. SRI. A.M. SHARATH CHANDRA, DIRECTOR, M/S DUO ASSOCIATES PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.28, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560042 3. SRI. T. PHANI MAHESH DIRECTOR, M/S DUO ASSOCIATES Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31076 CRL.P No. 4268 of 2023 PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.28, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560042 …RESPONDENTS THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 25.03.2023 PASSED BY THE VII ADDL.S.C.J. AND A.C.M.M., BENGALURU (SCCH-03) IN C.C.NO.46/2012, CONSEQUENTLY BRING BACK THE ACCUSED NO.3/RESPONDENT NO.3 ON THE RECORD RETAINING HIM AS A PARTY TO THE PROCEEDINGS IN THE SAID COMPLAINT AND THEN PROCEED FURTHER WITH THE CASE. THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER In the morning session, there is no representation for the petitioner. Even in the afternoon session also there is no representation. 2. On 31.07.2025, a conditional order was passed indicating that, if the office objections are not complied with, necessary orders will be passed. 3. Despite the same, office objections are not been complied with. It appears that the petitioner is not - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31076 CRL.P No. 4268 of 2023 interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default. 4. In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8