Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56610 (MAD)

K.PARAMANANDHAM v. STATE REP. BY ITS

WP/15991/2024 · 2025-03-04

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.15991 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.15991 of 2024 K.Paramanandham ... Petitioner Vs 1. State Rep. By Its Inspector of Police, Kadampuliyur Police Station, Cuddalore District. 2. A.Arulprakasam ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute matter pending on the file of Sub Court, Panruti in O.S.No.201/22 in respect of New S.No.218/1 measuring an extent of 1.36 cents at Meliruppu village, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore district. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Rajmohan For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.V.Regunathan ORDER https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15991 of 2024 This Writ Petition has been filed for direction directing the first respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute matter pending on the file of Sub Court, Panruti in O.S.No.201/22 in respect of New S.No.218/1 measuring an extent of 1.36 cents at Meliruppu village, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore district. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the first respondent would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner, the enquiry has been conducted in CSR No.331 of 2024 and the same has been closed. 4. Even then, the first respondent has no role to play in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the second respondent. 5. In view of the above, the first respondent is directed not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15991 of 2024 second respondent. At the same time, if any illegality committed by the petitioner or the second respondent, the first respondent is at liberty to take appropriate action as against them in accordance with law. 6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition petition is disposed of. No costs. 04.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order mn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.15991 of 2024 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn To 1. The Inspector of Police, Kadampuliyur Police Station, Cuddalore District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. W.P.No.15991 of 2024 04.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis