Page No. 1/3 GAHC010006462025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/199/2025 JALAL UDDIN AHMED AND 8 ORS S/O ABDUL SAHID, R/O VILL- ILASHPUR, P.O.-BARAIGRAM, DIST- SRI BHUMI (ASSAM) 2: ANOWAR HUSSAIN S/O ABDUS SOHID R/O VILL- ILASHPUR P.O.-BARAIGRAM DIST- SRI BHUMI (ASSAM) 3: SAHAB UDDIN AHMED S/O BASIR UDDIN R/O VILL- ILASHPUR P.O.-BARAIGRAM DIST- SRI BHUMI (ASSAM) 4: MOTOSIN ALI S/O SOYON ALI R/O VILL- ILASHPUR P.O.-BARAIGRAM DIST- SRI BHUMI (ASSAM) 5: SABBIR AHMED S/O SOWAB ALI R/O VILL- ILASHPUR P.O.-BARAIGRAM DIST- SRI BHUMI (ASSAM) 6: SOFI BIBI W/O FOYJUL HOQUE R/O VILL- ILASHPUR P.O.-BARAIGRAM DIST- SRI BHUMI (ASSAM) Page No. 2/3 7: NOOR ISLAM S/O ABDUL RAHMAN R/O VILL- ILASHPUR P.O.-BARAIGRAM DIST- SRI BHUMI (ASSAM) 8: HALIMA BEGUM W/O BABUL UDDIN R/O VILL- ILASHPUR P.O.-BARAIGRAM DIST- SRI BHUMI (ASSAM) 9: JOYRUL ISLAM S/O MONTAZ ALI R/O VILL- ILASHPUR P.O.-BARAIGRAM DIST- SRI BHUMI (ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PANJABARI JURIPAR GUWAHATI-37 4:THE DISTRICT DELIMITATION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SRI BHUMI (ASSAM) PIN-78871 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N H LASKAR, MR. T A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., GA, ASSAM,SC, A S E C Page No. 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 20.01.2025 Mr. N.H. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners want to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to file afresh. Mr. K. Konwar, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam for the respondent nos. 1, 3 & 4 and Mr. R. Dubey, learned Standing Counsel, Assam State Election Commission for the respondent no. 2, who are in attendance, have submitted that they have no objection if the writ petition is withdrawn, with the liberty. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands dismissed, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant