AD 37 Ct No.16 30.04.2025 (SSS) FMAT 15 of 2025 With CAN 1 of 2025 Basant Baid Vs. Avinash Sethi and Anr. Mr. Shuvasish Sengupta, Mr. Subhra Das ….For the Appellant. 1. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the present appeal has become infructuous, since the interim order challenged herein has not been extended subsequently. 2. Accordingly, the appellant does not want to press the application. 3. Hence, CAN 1 of 2025, filed for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal, is dismissed as not pressed in view of the observations made above. Consequentially, FMAT 15 of 2025 is dismissed as non est in the eye of law. 4. No order as to costs. (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.) (Uday Kumar, J.)