FARHEEN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/4838/2025 · 2025-05-13
Sukhvinder Kaur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56604 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56604 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 CRWP-4838-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.05.2025. Farheen and another ....Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. ***
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advocate and Ms. Kajal Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR
, J. (Oral)
Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents No. 1 to 3 to provide protection of life and liberty to the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of private respondents No.4 to 6.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major, petitioner No.1 – Farheen, aged 21 years and petitioner No.2 – Mujahid, aged 21 years and have got married on 22.04.2025, against the wishes of their family members, arrayed as respondents No.4 to 6. The copies of Aadhaar card of petitioners (Annexures P-1 and P-2) have been placed on record. Copy of marriage certificate/ Nikahnama has also been placed on record as Annexure P-3. It has been further submitted that the private respondents are threatening to interfere in the marital life of the petitioners. Hence, they are seeking protection in that regard and have approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition. KOMAL 2025.05.13 17:46 I attest to the accuracy of this document
CRWP-4838-2025 (O&M) -2- Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court Mr. Arjun Lakhanpal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, the petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 25.04.2025 (Annexure P-4) at the earliest and take necessary steps, if any required, in accordance with law, to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.
(SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 13.05.2025 Komal
Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.05.13 17:46 I attest to the accuracy of this document