Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:82899 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6738 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neeraj Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Puneet Bhadauria,Vishal Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus to command the respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization under the Uttar Pradesh Regularization of Persons Working on Daily Wages or on Work Charge or on Contract in Government Departments on Group 'C' And Group 'D' Posts (Outside the Purview of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission) Rules, 2016 (herein after referred to as 'Regularization Rules, 2016'). It is pleaded in the writ petition that petitioner has been working as clerk-cum-typist in the office of the respondent since 1st October, 1995. It is further contended that even though petitioner's services came to be dispensed with against which petitioner had approached the Labour Court, which made an award in favour of the petitioner on 18th April, 2006. The department though preferred a writ petition against the award but the same stood dismissed on 30th March, 2011, against which a special appeal was preferred further by the department which also got dismissed on 19th November, 2013 and consequently petitioner stood reinstated pursuant to the labour court award. In the given facts and circumstances of the case, since petitioner has been working since 1st October, 1995 and the Labour Court's award stands in favour of the petitioner directing for a reinstatement, claim of the petitioner can be considered by the concerned competent respondent under the relevant Regularization Rules, 2016. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection in the event a direction is issued for consideration of claim of the petitioner in accordance with law by the competent authority. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the competent authority annexing therewith all the requisite documents and certified copy of this order within a period of four weeks from today and in the event such representation is made as directed herein above, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the concerned competent authority in accordance with law within a further period of two months. Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Atmesh Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad