Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56602 (AP)

VEERA HARINADH BABU v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/36407/2025 · 2025-12-29

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010703272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 36407/2025 Between: 1. VEERA HARINADH BABU, S/O RAMA SURYA CHANDRA RAO AGED 45 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O OPP. B.S.N.L EXCHANGE, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, O/O STATION HOUSE OFFICER C.I.D, (CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT), 1ST FLOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH POLICE HEAD QUARTER, (DGP OFFICE), VIJAYAWADA-GUNTUR HIGHWAY, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522503. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CID POLICE STATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI, MANGALAGIRI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the of the 2nd Respondent in not furnishing the information in pursuance of Petitioner application dated 11/12/205 in terms of section 7 (1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 within stipulated time as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to forthwith furnish the information sought by the Petitioner in pursuance of the application dated 11/12/2025 and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to forthwith furnish the copies of the information sought by the Petitioner in pursuance of the application dated 11/12/2025 and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SYED KHADER MASTAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 36407 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the of the 2nd Respondent in not furnishing the information in pursuance of Petitioner application dated 11/12/205 in terms of section 7 (1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 within stipulated time as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to forthwith furnish the information sought by the Petitioner in pursuance of the application dated 11/12/2025 and be pleased to pass.…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondents are not furnishing the information which was sought under Right to Information Act, 2025. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the police. 4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on oral instructions, submitted that there is a clear appellate remedy available to the petitioner and that, instead of availing the said remedy, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work-out his remedy before the appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.36407 of 2025 Dated.30.12.2025 TVN 298