IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 696 of 2021. Decided on : 11 th April, 2025. Hira Nand Sharma ...Petitioner. Versus District & Sessions Judge, Shimla & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition had been filed by the petitioner challenging the initiation of inquiry against him but now with the passage of time the inquiry has culminated into issuance of censure against him. Thus, though the subject matter of the instant petition has been rendered infructuous and he is under instructions to withdraw it, however, he seeks liberty to approach this Court or any other appropriate forum against the order dated 16.08.2023, in case so advised. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 11th April, 2025. (jai) …2…