Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 566 (UTT)

KUMAN SINGH GUNJIYAL v. UNION OF INDIA

WPSB/332/2020 · 2026-07-03

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010108042020 2025:UHC:5826-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/332/2020 Shri. Kuman Singh Gunjiyal --Petitioner Versus Union of India & others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Akshay Latwal, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Standing Counsel for the Union of India/ respondents. 3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- “I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant one notional increment with effect from 1st July, 2019 for the complete service rendered by the petitioner from 1st July, 2018 to 30th June, 2019 and consequentially re-fix the pensionary benefits. II. Issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant arrears of pensionary benefits from the date of retirement of the petitioner along with interest @ 18% per annum till the date of payment.” 4. It has come on record that annual increment was given to petitioner on 1st January of each year. Therefore, the relief as claimed by petitioner is totally misconceived, the writ petition is ill advised. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. No order as to costs. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 03.07.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAA B21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.07.03 19:34:15 +05'30'