APHC010527472003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10487/2003 Between: 1. V.SESHABRAHMACHAYULU, S/O VENKATACHARI SECRETARY PANIDAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., PANIDAM PO, SATTENAPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, GUNTUR GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE GUNTUR DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER GUNTUR 3. PANIDAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERTIVE SOCIETY LTD, SATTENAPALLY PANIDAM, SATTENAPALLY MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or directions more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the instructions dt.19.4.2003 in Memo AOF No.768/2003-2004 of the 2nd respondent herein i.e. The Guntur District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Guntur, represented by its General Manager, instructing the 3rd respondent herein i.e., PIC committee of Panidam PACS Ltd., No.I 820, Panidam (PO) Sattenapally (M) Guntur District, as they are without jurisdiction, arbitrary, contrary to law besides being violative of cardinal principles of natural justice and hence set aside and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 13159 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased - IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 13160 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the instructions dt.19.4.2003 in AOFNO.768/2003- 2004 of the 2nd respondent herein i.e., the Guntur District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., Guntur represented by its General Manager, pending disposal of above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V BHADRAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE 2. GP FOR COOPERATION 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 11.09.2025 and 11.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP 4 192 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:10487 of 2003 Date: 25.09.2025 MP