APHC010671222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 34803 OF 2025 Between: 1. DUDEKULA HUSSAIN BASHA, S/o Late Dudekula Yeranna Aged about 50 years, Occ- Cultivation, R/o. H.NO-1/12, Taggu Veedhi, ' Rupanagudi Village, Uyyaiawada Mandal, Nandyal District, Erstwhile Kurnool District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Nandyala District, Nandyala Erstwhile Kurnool District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nandyal, Nandyal District. Erstwhile Kurnool District. 4. The Tahsildar, Uyyaiawada Mandal, Nandyala District, Erstwhile Kurnool District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMESH N Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE 2 W.P.No.34803 of 2025 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “...to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent rejected the petitioners mutation application on 22-07-2025 vide Application No.MLPM250623103238, dated 23-06- 2025 is as illegal, arbitrary improper, unjust and violative of principal of natural justice apart violative of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to consider the petitioners mutation application No.MLPM250623103238, dated 23-06-2025 for mutate the petitioners name instead of the petitioner’s demised mother name in online adangal and 1-B record in respect of an extent of Ac.0.90 cents in Sy No.3/1 and an extent of Ac.0.99 cents in Sy.No.3/2 total outcome an extent Ac.1.89 cents of M.Govindapalli Village, Uyyalawada Mandal, Nandyal District, Erstwhile Kurnool District and pass...” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, submitted that the concerned respondents will pass a reasoned order and requested to dispose of the writ petition. 4. Considering the submissions made, the impugned rejection order dated 22.07.2025 is set aside remanding the matter to the respondent No.4 to reconsider the entire issue, if required, providing an opportunity of hearing the petitioner before passing orders. The said exercise should be completed within two (2) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 3 W.P.No.34803 of 2025 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH Date: 22.12.2025 NSM 4 W.P.No.34803 of 2025 25 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 34803 OF 2025 22.12.2025 NNSSM M