IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.25116 of 2025 Alok Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. D.K. Panda, Advocate -versus- M.C.L., Sambalpur & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. D. Mohanty, Advocate for MCL CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 19.09.2025 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard Mr. D.K. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D. Mohanty, learned counsel for the M.C.L. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the M.C.L. that because of some action taken against the petitioner by State Bank of India, petitioner is not getting his salary, even though the same is being deposited in the account of the petitioner available with State Bank of India. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner on the other hand contended that vide Annexure-2, a request though has been made to allow the petitioner to change p. 2 p. 2 his account to any other Bank, but no decision has been taken. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the dispute involved, this Court directs Opposite Party No.2 to take a lawful decision on the request made by the petitioner under Annexure-2 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt copy of this order with due communication to the petitioner. 6. The writ petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge amit