Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56571 (KAR)

SMT. LAKSHMAMMA v. RETURNING OFFICER

CRP/227/2022 · 2025-11-21

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48309 CRP No. 227 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 227 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O. SRI. RAJANNA D.K., AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT DASARAHALLI VILLAGE (AT AND POST) KASABA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMUKUR - 572 129. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVIKUMARA B.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RETURNING OFFICER ELECTION COMMISSION, THUMBADI GRAMPANCHAYATHI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMUKUR - 572 129. 2. ELECTION OFFICER TAHASILDHAR, KORATAGERE TALUK, KORATAGERE, TUMUKUR - 572 129. 3. SMT. PUTTAMMA W/O. LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT DASARAHALLI AT AND POST, KASABA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMUKUR - 572 129. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48309 CRP No. 227 of 2022 4. SMT. PUSHPALATHA G. N. W/O. VEERANAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT DASARAHALLI AT AND POST, KASABA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMUKUR - 572 129. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BHOJEGOUDA T. KOLLER, AGA FOR R1 AND R2 R3 AND R4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09.12.2021 PASSED ON IA IN EP.NO.2/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL., SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADHUGIRI, ALLOWING I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as under: "The undersigned counsel for the petitioner herewith prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioner to file the appropriate appeal after - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48309 CRP No. 227 of 2022 withdrawing the present petition and kindly condone the delay of days spent in this petition while preferring the other and appropriate appeal, in the interest of justice and equity." Placing the memo on record, the civil revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings. However, the time spent before this Court shall be excluded for computation of limitation in the fresh proceedings. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34 CT-SG