APHC010637682022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 38055/2022 Between: 1. C.PURUSHOTHAM, S/O. BEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/ O. PATHEGADA, KALIKIRI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KALIKIRI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. POLANKI ANAND SURYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.38055 of 2022 The Court made the following Order:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in taking steps for levelling the Hillock in an extent of Ac.4.22 cents in survey No. 87/3 of Pathegada Village, Kalikiri Mandal, Annamayya District, for allotment of house sites, under the programme of Navaratnalu Pedalandariki illu, without considering the representation of the petitioner dated 01.11.2022 and without following as per G.O.Ms.No.510, dated 30.12.2019. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter affidavit of the 4th respondent submits that the Sy.No.87 of Pathegada Village in an extent of Ac.23.00 cents is classified a Gayalu (un- assessed waste) as per the village accounts. The same has been sub-divided as 87/1 to an extent of Ac.8.96 cents, 87/2 to an extent of Ac.2.74 cents and 396 to an extent of Ac.11.30 cents was formed out of the huge block. The Sy.No.87/1 with an extent of Ac.8.96 cents has been further sub-divided as Sy.No.87/1A to an extent of Ac.4.74 cents, Sy.No.87/1B to an extent of Ac.1.31 cents (AWD) and Sy.No.87/1C to an extent of Ac.2.91 cents (AWD) subsequently. There exists RF road to an extent of Ac.0.21 cents in Sy.No.87/1C1, HNSS Canal to an extent of Ac.1.65 cents in Sy.No.87/1C2, MPFC go-down in an extent of Ac.0.45 cents in Sy.No.87/1C3 and Ac.0.60 cents is covered by a sheet of Rock. An extent of Ac.0.521/2 cents in 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.38055 of 2022 Sy.No.87/1C3 has been proposed for grant of house sites to the eligible poor under the welfare scheme of housing. Actually there is no Sy.No.87/3 to an extent of Ac.4.22 cents as claimed by the petitioner. It is only a notional number and actually Sy.No.87/1A is having an extent of Ac.4.74 cents and Sy.No.87/1B is having an extent of Ac.1.31 cents and Sy.No.87/1C is having an extent of Ac.2.91 cents, which are sub-divided from Sy.No.87/1 in an extent of Ac.8.96 cents. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, as the said survey number and the subject extent does not exist and as no prejudice would cause to the petitioner, no relief can be granted in this writ petition. Even assuming that the subject survey number and the subject extent as claimed by the petitioner exists, as there was no proposal for the formation of house sites to distribute the house site pattas as proposed by the respondents at that point of time as stated above and in view of the same, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 06.10.2025 PGT