Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56569 (AP)

Bhvya Sri Transport, v. Bharat Pettroleum Corporation Limited,

WP/31966/2016 · 2025-10-06

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010799562016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31966/2016 Between: 1. BHVYA SRI TRANSPORT, SISTUATED AT D.NO. 5-130, CHENUDRTHI VILLAGE, GOLLAPROLU MANDAL, EAST GODAWARI DISTRICT. 533449. REP BY ITS PROP: P. BULLI BABJI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. BHARAT PETTROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, REP BY ITS TERRITORY MANAGER (1&C), CHENNAI 1, RANGANTHAN GARDENS, OFF. 11TH MAINROAD, ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI- 600040 2. INSTLATION MANAGER, BHARAT PRTROLEUM CORPORTION LTD. VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. GRADUATES TRANSPORT SERVICE, POLT NO. 19 & 20 'B' BLOCK, AUTONAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM REP BY ITS PROP. M. ESWARA RAO 4. SREE KANYA TRANSPORT, POLT NO. 19 & 20 'B' BLOCK, AUTONAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM REP BY ITS PROP. M. ESWARA RAO. 5. VANKAYALA CHALAMAIAH SONS, POLT NO. 19 & 20 'B' BLOCK, AUTONAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM REP BY ITS PROP. M. ESWARA RAO. 2 JS,J W.P.No.31966/2016 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents 1 and 2 in not considering the case of petitioner to allot the work in pursuance of Tender Notification No. BPC/I&C/SR/13/ Black Oil- Vizag/ 2016 dated 15.06.2016. as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural Justice, contrary to the Rules of Reservations contrary to terms of Tender No.PBC/I&C SR/13/ Black oilVizag/2016 dated 15.06.2016 and consequently direct the Respondent 1 and 2 to consider the case of the petitioner under Reservation category/open category to allot the work in pursuance of the Notification issued in Tender No. PBC/I&C/SR/13/Black oil Vizag/dated 15.06.2016 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 39535 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including execution of work orders by Respondents 1 and 2 pursuance of the Tender notice issued in Tender No. PBC/I&C/ SR/13/ Black oil-Vizag/ 2016 dated 15.06.2016 issued by the 1st Respondent pending disposal of the main Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O MANOHER REDDY 3 JS,J W.P.No.31966/2016 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 07.10.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.31966/2016 166 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 31966/2016 Date: 07.10.2025 KAS