Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56565 (AP)

P.V.S. NANI BABU, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST & 5 OTHERS v. PRL. SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES DEPT., HYD & 4 OTHERS

WP/21421/2016 · 2025-09-24

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010125912016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21421/2016 Between: 1. P.V.S. NANI BABU, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST & 5 OTHERS, S/O. CHELLAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE, THE CHODAVARAM CO-OP SUGARS LTD., SALARY CODE 2295, RIO.SUGAR FACTORY QUARTERS, AMBURUPURAM VILLAGE, GOVADA POST, VISAKHAPATNA DISTRICT - 531 023 2. BERA NARAYANA RAO,, S/O. LATE APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE, THE CHODAVARM CO-OP SUGARS LTD., SALARY CODE : 7134, G.NO. 28546, R/O. NEAR RAMALAYAM, GOVADA POST, VISAKHAPATNA DISTRICT - 531 023 3. TALARI SATYANARAYANA,, S/O.VENKU NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE, THE CHODAVARAM CO-OP SUGARS LTD., SALARY CODE: 5078, NEAR S.C.COLONY P.S.PETA VILLAGE, CHODAVARAM POST, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. PIN : 531 036. 4. P.TULASI,, W/O. P.V.S.NANI BABU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC:FARMER, G.NO.15811, R/O. AMBURUPURAM VILLAGE, GOVADA POST, VISAKHAPATNA DISTRICT - 531 023 5. T.VENKATA KUARI,, W/O. J.SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: FARMER,G.NO.29471, R/O.NEAR S C COLONY, P.S.PETA, CHODAVARAM POST - 531 036 VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. ATTA SRINU,, S/O. GANGA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE, THE CHODAVARAM CO-OP SUGARS LTD., R/O. NEAR SHIVALAYAM, GOVADA - 531 023, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 2 1. PRL SECRETARY INDUSTRIES DEPT HYD 4 OTHERS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT A.P.SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. DIRECTOR OF SUGAR CANE COMMISSIONER, STATE OF A.P. H.NO. 5-10-174, 1' FLOOR, SHAKKAR BHAVAN, FATEH MAIDAN ROAD, OPP: POLICE CONTROL ROOM, HYDERABAD. 3. THE CHODAVARAM COOP SUGARS LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NO.B.1109. GOVADA - 531 023. CHODAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. G NAGESWARA RAO, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC:PROCESS ADVISOR ON CONTRACT BASIS FACTORY QUARTER, THE CHODAVARAM COOPERATIVE SUGARS LTD., GOVADA - 531023, CHODAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 5. E RAMA KRISHNA, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC:ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL ADVISOR ON CONTRACT BASIS FACTORY QUARTER, THE CHODAVARAM COOPERATIVE SUGARS LTD., GOVADA - 531023, CHODAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. D SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Y ASHOK RAJ 2. GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (AP) 3. T BALAJI 4. N SUBBA RAO 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in passing orders from time to time to continue the 4th & 5th respondents as process advisor and administrative/financial advisor on contract basis of the 3rd respondent sugar factory even after their retirement, as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to law and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to appoint suitable candidates for the said posts of Chief Chemist and administrative Officer for 3rd respondent Sugar Factory on permanent basis either by appointing or promoting suitable candidates immediately in the place of 4th & 5th Respondents forthwith in the interests of justice…..” 2. On 24.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption „for dismissal‟. 3. Today also, despite the matter being listed under the caption „for dismissal‟, none appeared for the petitioners. From this, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 25.09.2025 Ivd 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.21421 of 2016 Date: 25.09.2025 Ivd