1 APHC010060132021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3718/2021 Between: 1. SHAIK NIZAMUDDIN,, S/O YAQUB, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC, PETTY BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO 12-93/1, KOTHAPET, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. RAJA MOHANA RAO, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, I TOWN POLICE STATION, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. , 5. MUTHANGI SRINIVASA RAO, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, I TOWN POLICE STATION, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. ARE SUBBARAMIREUDY, S/O LAXMI NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO 403, SEVEN HILLS APARTMENTS, MUTYALAPETA, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3718 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in summoning the Petitioner to the 3rd respondent Police Station and detaining hours together in the 3rd respondent Police Station and abusing the Petitioner and his mother in filthy language at the instigation of the 6th respondent without there being any crime against the Petitioner is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and viiolative of principles enshrined under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 to 5 not to summon the Petitioner to the 3rd respondent Police Station and not to detain the Petitioner in the 3rd respondent Police Station without there being any crime against the Petitioner, and pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.10.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.3718 of 2021 Dated.08.10.2025 UPS 66