Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56563 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/1129/2025 · 2025-09-11

J J Munir

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1129 of 2025 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, J. 1. In compliance with the order dated 07.07.2025, the Tehsildar, Tehsil- Bhanpur, District- Basti has filed his personal affidavit dated 28.07.2025. In paragraph nos. 8 and 9 of the said affidavit, it is averred: "8. That, in view of the above stated facts and circumstances, it is respectfully submitted that the present matter stands fully complied with both in letter and spirit in accordance with the directions issued by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 07.07.2025. The illegal encroachment made by respondent no.6 over the Gram Sabha land bearing Gata No.135 has been completely removed; the remaining debris including the tin shed and other partially standing remnants have also been cleared in entirety on 24.07.2025 in the presence of the concerned revenue authorities as well as the petitioner. The proceedings of compliance were duly recorded on the spot and bear the signature of the petitioner in token of his satisfaction and acknowledgment of the full compliance. 9. That, the said land now stands restored to its original status as "agriculturally cultivable barren land" under Category 5-3-Ka in the name of Gram Sabha, free from any encroachment or obstruction. In the totality of the circumstances, no further cause of action survives for adjudication in the present Writ Petition, and the grievance of the petitioner stands effectively redressed. It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to record the aforesaid compliance and be further pleased to pass such order(s) as may be deemed just and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kanhaiya Lal Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta Ajay Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) proper in the facts and interest of justice." 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner says that encroachment, including debris, has been removed. 3. In this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be made in this petition. It is, accordingly, consigned to record. September 12, 2025 Prashant D. WPIL No. 1129 of 2025 2 (J.J. Munir,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRASHANT DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad