IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1892 OF 2021 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of.Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein, the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent for her willful disobedience of Order Dt.16.09.2019 passed in WP.No.13629 of 2019 on the file of this Court. Between: Kotamarthi Hrudaya, W/o Venkatesu, aged 47 years, Occ. Cultivation R/o D.N. Rao Peta, Chintalapudi Mandal, West Godavari District. ...PETITIONER(S) AND D.L.Pramodwara Devi, W/o Not Knpwii working as Tahsildar, Chintalapudi Mandal, West Godavari District ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondents: P SUBASH The Court made the following: .s. r APHC010419552021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1892/2021 Between: ...PETITIONER Kotamarthi Hrudaya AND ...CONTEMNOR D L Pramodwara Devi Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NiMMAGADDA REVATHl Counsel for the Contemnor: 1.P SUBASH The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 16.09.2019 7 passed in W.P.No.13629 of 2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that instead of conducting survey, an endorsement has been passed by the respondents on the petitioner’s application dated 02.12.2019 duly stating that they have 2. / /' •c 5 if conducted survey. In fact, they have not conducted any survey, as such, prayed to pass appropriate orders. This Court has not given any specific direction to conduct 3. any survey on the petitioners application but only directed to dispose of the application. The endorsement filed along with the counter would indicate that due to some objections raised by the neighbours of the petitioner, the survey could not be conducted. If at all, the petitioner has any grievance against such endorsement, he has to take steps in accordance with law. This Court does not find any willful disobedience on the part of the respondents as alleged by the petitioner, as such, the contempt case is liable to be closed. 4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take steps against the endorsement issued by the respondents i:. accordance with law before appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. in As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sdl- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR 1 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Tahsildar.Chintalapudi Devi, W/o Not Known working as 1 D.L.Pramodwara Mandal,West Godavari District . NIMMAGADDA REVATHl Advocate [OPUC] 2. OneCCto SRI 3. One CC to SRI. P SUBASH Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies Pmg AL •r- HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ^Tof ano(«^ ORDER H iUG 2(W S II ^ Currem Mcuon . ■}> ^^i£fSPATC«tS^ CC.No.1892of2021 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE