Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56547 (PNJ)

RAJINDER SINGH TANWAR v. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/13521/2025 · 2025-05-21

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-13521 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (280) Rajinder Singh Tanwar The State of CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the respondent No.3 decide the appeal No. pending applications 2. dated 13.05.2025, this Court, had passed the hereinafter extracted order, upon the instant writ petition : 13521-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rajinder Singh Tanwar Versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Ms. Sunita Shekhawat, Advocate for Mr. Rishi Pal Singh, Advocate Mr. Hirender Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, Haryana. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon the respondent No.3-State Registrar, Firms and Societies, Haryana, appeal No.17 of 2025, along with the stay application, and other applications. At the time of issuance of notice of motion, dated 13.05.2025, this Court, had passed the hereinafter extracted order, upon the instant writ petition :- “Through the instant petition prayer is made for issuance of directions to respondent No.3 and Societies, Haryana to hear and decide the appeal No. 17 of 2025, along with the stay application, and other applications, if any, whereth dated 14.12.2021 (Annexure P 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13521-2025 Date of Decision : 21.05.2025 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Ms. Sunita Shekhawat, Advocate for Advocate and , Advocate Pankaj Mulwani, DAG, Haryana. Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon State Registrar, Firms and Societies, Haryana, to hear and long with the stay application, and other At the time of issuance of notice of motion, by drawing an order dated 13.05.2025, this Court, had passed the hereinafter extracted order, upon “Through the instant petition prayer is made for issuance of directions to respondent No.3 – State Registrar Firms and Societies, Haryana to hear and decide the appeal No. 17 of 2025, along with the stay application, and other applications, if any, wherethrough the quashing of order dated 14.12.2021 (Annexure P-1) and order dated Through the instant writ petition, cast under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a mandamus, upon to hear and long with the stay application, and other by drawing an order dated 13.05.2025, this Court, had passed the hereinafter extracted order, upon “Through the instant petition prayer is made for issuance State Registrar Firms and Societies, Haryana to hear and decide the appeal No. 17 of 2025, along with the stay application, and other rough the quashing of order 1) and order dated MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.26 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-13521 3. him by Mr. Susheel, within the next two months, the appeal (supra), and all other pending applications thereto, would be finally decide 4. counsel, no further petition, and the same is hereby, 5. May 21, 2025 Manpreet 13521-2025 28.01.2022 (Annexure P Registrar Kurukshetra- respondent No.4, has been sought. Notice of motion for 21.05.2025. Mr. Bhupender Singh, learned DAG, H notice qua respondents No. 1 to 6 and waives service on their behalf. Notice to respondents No. 7 to 31, subject to furnishing requisite process fee by the petitioner for the date fixed. Process dasti as well. On the next date of hearing, inform this Court, after having apt instructions from the respondent No.3 – State Registrar Firms and Societies, Haryana, as to how much time is required to decide the appeal (supra).” Today, learned counsel for the State, on instructions imparted to him by Mr. Susheel, Industrial Extension Officer, within the next two months, the appeal (supra), and all other pending applications thereto, would be finally decide In view of the above statement, as made by the learned State counsel, no further direction is required to be passed in the instant writ petition, and the same is hereby, closed. Consequently, the instant writ petition , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2 28.01.2022 (Annexure P-2), as passed by the District respondent No.4, has been sought. Notice of motion for 21.05.2025. Mr. Bhupender Singh, learned DAG, Haryana accepts notice qua respondents No. 1 to 6 and waives service on Notice to respondents No. 7 to 31, subject to furnishing requisite process fee by the petitioner for the date fixed. On the next date of hearing, learned State counsel shall inform this Court, after having apt instructions from the State Registrar Firms and Societies, Haryana, as to how much time is required to decide the Today, learned counsel for the State, on instructions imparted to Industrial Extension Officer, informs this Court, that within the next two months, the appeal (supra), and all other pending applications thereto, would be finally decided, by the respondent No.3. In view of the above statement, as made by the learned State direction is required to be passed in the instant writ Consequently, the instant writ petition is disposed of. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No 2), as passed by the District respondent No.4, has been sought. aryana accepts notice qua respondents No. 1 to 6 and waives service on Notice to respondents No. 7 to 31, subject to furnishing requisite process fee by the petitioner for the date fixed. learned State counsel shall inform this Court, after having apt instructions from the State Registrar Firms and Societies, Haryana, as to how much time is required to decide the Today, learned counsel for the State, on instructions imparted to informs this Court, that within the next two months, the appeal (supra), and all other pending In view of the above statement, as made by the learned State direction is required to be passed in the instant writ MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.26 10:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment