Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56547 (AP)

MAKINENI ANITHA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/4120/2024 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010074312024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4120/2024 Between: MAKINENI ANITHA, W/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGE ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O FLAT NO.301, SAI KRISHNA BRUNDAVANAM, 4TH LINE, SAI KRISHNA NAGAR, GUJJANAGUNDLA, SAI NAGAR, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 3. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PATTABHIPURAM POLICE STATION, PATTABHIPURAM, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K VISWANATHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not registering the FIR and to file charge sheet by investigating the matter, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to register the FIR against the culprits, investigate the matter and to file charge sheet.” 2 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the contents of the complaint given by the Petitioner are false, as such, the Police have not registered any case based on the said complaint. 3. Sri K.Viswanatham, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.4120 of 2024 Dt.22.11.2025 Dinesh