Challa Venkata Narayana, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/34593/2017 · 2025-12-30
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56541 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56541 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010843222017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34593/2017 Between:
1. CHALLA VENKATA NARAYANA,, S/O.C. REDDEPPA, AGE 42 YEARS, OCC: A.P.M., GOPAVARAM, R/O.AKKASANIPALLE, S.V.PALLE POST, PALUPULA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KADAPA YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, -
3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, A.P.DAIRY DEVELOPMENT COOP. FEDERATION LTD., KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE COORDINATOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VELUGU, KADAPA DISTRICT, AT KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.4 in issuing the proceedings in RC.No.N.A-4/1323/2016 dated 07-10-2017 directing the petitioner to remit the difference amount of Rs.1,30,715/- is illegal, highly arbitrary, contrary to the settled principles of law, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently suspend the proceedings in RC No. 650/2017/NA.4 dated 13.05.2017. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PRUDHVI RAJ MUDUNURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34593/2017 Order:
This Instant Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer:
“….to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.4 in issuing the proceedings in RC No.N.A-4/1323/2016 dated 07-10-2017 directing the petitioner to remit the difference amount of Rs.1,30,715/- is illegal, highly arbitrary, contrary to the settled principles of law, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently suspend the proceedings in RC No. 650/2017/NA.4 dated 13.05.2017.”
2. On 24.12.2025, this court passed the following order:
“No representation for the petitioner. Post next week under the caption „for dismissal‟.”
3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, though the case is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 4.
In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 4
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J
Date:31.12.2025 ARB/JAK
5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
15
WRIT PETITION NO: 34593 of 2017
Date:31.12.2025
ARB/JAK