- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27456 WP No. 21283 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.21283 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: MR. SYED SIRAJUDDIN S/O LATE SYED JILANI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT KODAGI THIRUMALAPURA VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 089. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KASHINATH J.D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 020. 3. THE TAHSILDAR YELAHANKA TALUK, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. 4. SRI. MANJU S. BUVALA S/O SURENDRA BUVALA Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27456 WP No. 21283 of 2025 AGE: MAJOR, R/AT HESARAGHATTA, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 088. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 10TH JANUARY, 2024 PASSED IN R.P.NO.436/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF RESPONDENT NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY RESTORE THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 07TH OCTOBER, 2023 PASSED IN R.P.NO.436/2023 WHICH IS A PART OF ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. Siddharth Babrurao, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 3. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 10th January, 2024 (Annexure-A) passed in R.P.No.436/2023, wherein the interim order passed on 07th October, 2023 is vacated by the respondent No.1; inter alia sought for restoration of the said interim order dated 07th October, 2023. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27456 WP No. 21283 of 2025 3. Heard Sri. Kashinath J.D., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 3. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the impugned order, it is not in dispute that the petitioner is challenging the order passed by the respondent No.1, vacating the interim order earlier granted in favour of the petitioner. Therefore, the respondent No.1 is directed to dispose of the R.P. No.436/2023 at the earliest, in any event, within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24