Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5653 (PNJ)

PUNJAB WALKF BOARD AND ORS v. RUBY JAIN AND ANR

RSA/303/2023 · 2026-02-12

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-303-20 IN THE HIG 245 Punjab Wak Rubi Jain an CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. against the whereby the decreed. 2. the Mediatio possibility o report dated settled betw 03.12.2025. 3. Board submi sum of ₹13 2023 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o Wakf Board and others Versus and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Ms. Priya, Advocate for Mr. GN Malik, Advocate for the Assisted by Ms. Sheeba Khan, A Punjab Wakf Board. Sh. Rakesh Kumar Jain, respond is present in person. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The defendant-Punjab Wakf t the concurrent judgments rendered by the suit of recovery filed by t Vide last order dated 28.11.202 ediation and Conciliation Centre of ility of amicable settlement between dated 03.12.2025, has been received a between the parties by way of 2025. Learned counsel appearing o submits that in terms of Settlement/A 13,23,494/- has been transferred ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-303-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.02.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA for the appellants han, Addl. Law Officer, espondent No. 1 akf Board is in second appeal ndered by both the District Courts by the plaintiff/respondents was .11.2025, the matter was referred to tre of this Court for exploring the tween the parties. Pursuant thereto, eived as per which the matter stands y of Settlement/Agreement dated ing on behalf of appellant-Wakf ent/Agreement dated 03.12.2025, a ferred to the respondents through peal urts was d to the reto, ands ted akf , a ugh RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.13 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-303-20 online RTG No. 2 who i amount of ₹ 4. submits that 5. 6. 7. the appellant to the appell 8. 12.02.2026 rishu 2023 (O&M) -2- RTGS dated 08.01.2026. Mr. Rak who is present in person acknowledg ₹13,23,494/-. In view of the above, learned co ts that she may be permitted to withdra Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that in case any pellant-Board before the Executing Co appellant, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable . Rakesh Kumar Jain, respondent wledges the receipt of the aforesaid rned counsel for the appellant-Board ithdraw the present second appeal. se any surety has been deposited by ing Court, the same may be released any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No dent said oard d by ased RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.13 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.