Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5653 (PAT)

Md. Atif v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./80688/2025 · 2026-03-19

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80688 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-452 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Md. Atif Son of Md. Allauddin Resident of Village - Chiotahan, Ps- Saraiya, Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.N.K.Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bharat Lal, APP For the Informant : Mr.Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 6 19-03-2026 Heard Mr. N. K. Aggarwal, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 452/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 140(2), 61(2) of B.N.S. later on Section 103(1) of B.N.S. was added. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is accused of killing the deceased. 4. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that out of eight, seven witnesses have been examined. Petitioner has no criminal Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80688 of 2025(6) dt.19-03-2026 2/2 antecedent and he is in custody since 11.08.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have jointly opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner is accused of killing the deceased. 6. Considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T