Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56511 (AP)

R.DESAIAH,BANK OF BARODA,TIRUMALA. v. THE CHAIRMAN, BANK OF BARODA, CENTRAL OFFICE, MUMBAI.

WP/21315/2002 · 2025-09-18

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010328842002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 21315/2002 Between: 1. R.DESAIAH, BANK OF BARODA,TIRUMALA., S/O. LAKSHMAIAH, TEMPORARY SUB-STAFF ('TSS") I.E. PEON, BANK OF BARODA, TIRUMALA. 2. K. PANDU,, S/O. RAMASWAMY, TEMPORARY SUB-STAFF (PEON), BANK OF BARODA, TIRUPATHI, 3. BABU BASHA,, S/O. HUSSAIN SAHEB, TEMPORARY SUB-STAFF (PENON), BANK OF BARODA, TIRUPATHI. 4. P. MUNISEKHAR,, S/O. SREERAMULU, TEMPORARY SUB-STAFF (PEON), BANK OF BARODA, TIRUPATHI. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE CHAIRMAN BANK OF BARODA CENTRAL OFFICE MUMBAI, BANK OF BARODA, CENTRAL OFFICE 19TH FLOOR, NEW STOCK EXCHANGE TOWERS, DALAL STREET, FORT, 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA, SOUTHZONE, C.P. RAMASWAMY ROAD, ALWARPET, 3. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA, REGIONAL OFFICE, BASHIRABAGH, HYDERABAD-500004 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased to issue an appropriate direction, order or writ more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring that the petitioners are not liable to retrenchment or termination or discontinuation from service for any reason whatever but entitled to parity in all respects with regular sub-staff of respondent-Bank and payment of arrears of wages due to them, in a period as may be specified and directed by this Hon'ble Court together with exemplary costs and advocates' fee as otherwise petitioners will suffer heavily irretrievable loss and injury. IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WVMP 3397 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in W.P.M.P.No.26677 of 2002 in W.P.No.21315/02 dated 08/10/2002. IA NO: 2 OF 2002(WPMP 26677 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim direction or order prohibiting or restraining the respondent-Bank or any of its authorities from terminating or discontinuing or retrenching any of them from service an any pretext whatsoever or even transferring any of them to any other branch of the respondent-bank outside their present station of work as it results in harassment and victimization without reasonable cause; otherwise they will suffer irretrievable loss and injury. IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 33032 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased fix a date for final hearing of the said WP and finally decide issue, otherwise Management may invoke the Damocles Sword of retrenchment, and to pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 8280 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Writ petitioner No.1 to withdraw from the above writ petition No.21315/02 and pass 3 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PARTY IN PERSON 2. P VENKATESWARA RAO 3. V SESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 4 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 29.08.2025, 01.08.2025, 25.07.2025 and 07.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting their case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 19.09.2025 MP 5 711 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:21315 of 2002 Date: 19.09.2025 MP