APHC010049322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2779 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-14 [3446] Satthala Subbamma and another ...Petitioners Vs. State of A P and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. B M Patro Advocate for Respondents : --- CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 6th February, 2025 P C : In view of the availability of an alternative remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, we do not find it a fit case to invoke our extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, considering the ratio of the judgments of the Apex Court in Radha Krishan Industries v. State of Himachal Pradesh [(2021) 6 SCC 771] and United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon [(2010) 8 SCC 110]. 2 HCJ & RRR, J WP_2779_2025 The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Vjl