APHC010156222021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9103/2021 Between: 1. SHAIK LAL BEE, , W/O. ERAGAMREDDY @ IRAGAMREDDY NAGA DASTHAGIRI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 2/218, KHADARPALLE, PALLAVOLU, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDL, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DGP OFFICE, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , NANDALURU P.S NANDALURU YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAILWAY KODUR P.S., RAILWAY KODUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , VONTIMITTA P.S., VONTIMITTA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , SIDHOUT P.S., SIDHOUT, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. . ... PETITIONER 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S DILIP JAYA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9103 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 7 in not producing and not filing the P.T. warrants against the husband of the Petitioner i.e., Eragamreddy @ Iragamreddy Naga Dasthagiri Reddy who is shown as accused in various crimes mentioned in the affidavit as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 7 to produce the husband of the petitioner i.e., Etagamreddy @ Iragamreddy Naga Dasthagiri Reddy before the concerned Judicial Magistrate on P.T. Warrant and pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.10.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.9103 of 2021 Dated.06.10.2025 UPS 138