1 2025:CGHC:6301 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2013 of 2022 1 - Gaurav Baradiya S/o Champalal Baradiya Aged About 37 Years R/o Kachahri Chowk, Near Suman Hotel, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 2 - Bhavya Construction R/o Kachahri Chowk, Near Suman Hotel, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioners versus Sanjay Golchha S/o Umesh Lal Golchha Aged About 46 Years R/o Sudharm Vihar, Pachpedi Naka, Tahsil And, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---Respondent CRMP No. 2014 of 2022 1 - Gaurav Baradiya S/o Champala Baradiya Aged About 37 Years R/o Kachahri Chowk, Near Suman Hotel, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Bhavya Construction R/o Kachahri Chowk, Near Suman Hotel, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioners Versus Sanjay Golchha S/o Umesh Lal Golchha Aged About 46 Years R/o Sudharm Vihar, Pachpedi Naka, Tahsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2026.06.19 18:56:05 +0530 2 CRMP No. 2018 of 2022 1 - Gaurav Baradiya S/o Champalal Baradiya Aged About 37 Years R/o Kachahri Chowk, Near Suman Hotel, District - Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 2 - Bhavya Construction R/o Kachahri Chowk, Near Suman Hotel, District - Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ---Petitioners Versus Sanjay Golchha S/o Umesh Lal Golchha Aged About 46 Years R/o Sudharm Vihar, Pachpedi Naka, Tahsil And District - Raipur Chhattisgarh --- Respondent CRMP No. 2019 of 2022 1 - Gaurav Baradiya S/o Champala Baradiya Aged About 37 Years R/o Kachahri Chowk, Near Suman Hotel, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 2 - Bhavya Construction R/o Kachahri Chowk, Near Suman Hotel District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioners Versus Sanjay Golchha S/o Umesh Lal Golchha Aged About 46 Years R/o Sudharmvihar, Pachpedi Naka, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent CRMP No. 2060 of 2022 1 - Gaurav Baradiya S/o Champalalbaradiya Aged About 37 Years R/o - Kachahrichowk, Near Suman Hotel, District-Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 3 2 - Bhavya Construction R/o - Kachahrichowk, Near Suman Hotel, District- Dhamtari ---Petitioners Versus Sanjay Gochha S/o- Umesh Lal Golchha Aged About 46 Years R/o- Sudharmvihar, Pachpedi Naka, Tahsil And District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent CRMP No. 2015 of 2022 1 - Gaurav Baradiya S/o Champalal Baradiya Aged About 37 Years R/o Kachahri Chowk, Near Suman Hotel, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Bhavya Construction R/o Kachahri Chowk, Near Suman Hotel, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioners Versus Sanjay Golchha S/o Umesh Lal Golchha Aged About 46 Years R/o Sudharm Vihar, Pachpedi Naka, Tahsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent For Petitioners : None. For Respondent : None. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 19.06.2026 4 1. None appears on behalf of either the petitioners or the respondents, nor have any representation been made to press this petitions. 2. By filing the petition (CRMP No. 2013 of 2022), the petitioners have prayed for following relief(s) :- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition by set-aside the order dated 05.08.2022 passed by the Learned Additional Session Judge Raipur of the District and Session Court, Raipur in Criminal Revision no. 206/2022 and quash the whole complaint case no. 5685/2021 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Raipur (C.G.) in the interest of justice.” 3. By filing the petition (CRMP No. 2014 of 2022), the petitioners have prayed for following relief(s) :- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition by set-aside the order dated 05.08.2022 passed by the Learned Additional Session Judge Raipur of the District and Session Court, Raipur in Criminal Revision no. 205/2022 and quash the whole complaint case no. 5674/2021 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Raipur (C.G.) in the interest of justice.” 4. By filing the petition (CRMP No. 2015 of 2022), the petitioners have prayed for following relief(s) :- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition by 5 set-aside the order dated 05.08.2022 passed by the Learned Additional Session Judge Raipur of the District and Session Court, Raipur in Criminal Revision no. 204/2022 and quash the whole complaint case no. 5678/2021 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Raipur (C.G.) in the interest of justice.” 5. By filing the petition (CRMP No. 2018 of 2022), the petitioners have prayed for following relief(s) :- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition by set-aside the order dated 05.08.2022 passed by the Learned Additional Session Judge Raipur of the District and Session Court, Raipur in Criminal Revision no. 208/2022 and quash the whole complaint case no. 5676/2021 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Raipur (C.G.) in the interest of justice.” 6. By filing the petition (CRMP No. 2019 of 2022), the petitioners have prayed for following relief(s) :- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition by set-aside the order dated 05.08.2022 passed by the Learned Additional Session Judge Raipur of the District and Session Court, Raipur in Criminal Revision no. 207/2022 and quash the whole complaint case no. 5671/2021 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Raipur (C.G.) in the interest of justice.” 7. By filing the petition (CRMP No. 2060 of 2022), the petitioners have prayed for following relief(s) :- 6 “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition by set-aside the order dated 05.08.2022 passed by the Learned Additional Session Judge Raipur of the District and Session Court, Raipur in Criminal Revision no. 209/2022 and quash the whole complaint case no. 5683/2021 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Raipur (C.G.) in the interest of justice.” 8. As per the status reports received, the trial in CRMP No. 2014 has already been concluded on 05.08.2022, and in the other cases, the trial have also been concluded on 28.03.2026. In view of the same, the reliefs sought in the present petitions have become infructuous, and nothing survives for consideration by this Court in these petitions. 9. Consequently, the present petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 10. Interim order, if any stands vacated. 11. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaibhav