Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56489 (PNJ)

CHANCHAL SINGH AND OTHERS v. RANA RAM SINGH

CRR/4530/2017 · 2025-09-02

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 239 Chanchal Singh & others Rana Ram Singh CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Ms. Anmol Thakur, Advocate, for Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Vikrant Mahajan, Advocate, for Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondents. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The present dated 13.09.2017 passed by the Gurdaspur allowing the by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurdaspur, whereby the complaint filed by the respondent bearing No.72 dated 30.11.2012 RBT No.246 dated 25.10.2013 against the petitioners under Sections 30 120-B IPC was dismissed at the preliminary stage. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present revision petition at 3. Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending misc. 02.09.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-4530 Date of decision: Chanchal Singh & others VERSUS Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Ms. Anmol Thakur, Advocate, for Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Vikrant Mahajan, Advocate, for Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been dated 13.09.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur allowing the revision against the order dated 21.07.2016 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurdaspur, whereby the complaint filed by the respondent bearing No.72 dated 30.11.2012 RBT .246 dated 25.10.2013 against the petitioners under Sections 30 B IPC was dismissed at the preliminary stage. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present revision petition at the outset Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed as Pending misc. applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4530-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.09.2025 …Petitioners ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Vikrant Mahajan, Advocate, for Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondents. revision petition has been filed against the order Additional Sessions Judge, revision against the order dated 21.07.2016 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurdaspur, whereby the complaint filed by the respondent bearing No.72 dated 30.11.2012 RBT .246 dated 25.10.2013 against the petitioners under Sections 302, 201, B IPC was dismissed at the preliminary stage. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks the outset. Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed as applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.03 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document