Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110327 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3860 of 2025 Applicant :- Sudhir And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by counsel for the applicants is taken on record. 2. Heard counsel for the applicants, Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record. 3. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.205 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 I.P.C., Police Station -Sehramau South, District- Shahjahanpur, during the pendency of trial. 4. Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the first information report the applicants along with ten named accused and unknown persons are alleged to have fired at the informant. In the alleged incident no injury has been sustained by any person. No medical report is available in the case diary. A vague and general role has been assigned to the applicants. During the course of investigation, the applicants were granted anticipatory bail till submission of police report by this Court vide order dated 30.9.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.38528 of 2019 (Sudhir and 7 others vs. State of U.P. and another). Investigation has been completed. Charge-sheet has been filed. The applicants had cooperated in the investigation. The applicants have been summoned by the concerned Court. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. The applicants have apprehension of their arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they will not misuse the said liberty. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the applicants, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicants, and the fact that in the alleged incident no injury has been sustained by any person; a vague and general role has been assigned to the applicants; during the course of investigation, the applicants were granted anticipatory bail till submission of police report by this Court vide order dated 30.9.2019; investigation has been completed; charge sheet has been filed; the applicants had cooperated in the investigation; the applicants have been summoned by the concerned court; no custodial interrogation is required; without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicants Sudhir, Kamlesh, Vipin, Sunil and Mahesh, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) the applicants shall make themselves available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be deposited by him before the concerned court. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 9. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Manish Kr Digitally signed by :- MANISH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad