APHC010294502024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2980/2024 Between: 1. M/S SRI LOTUS CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P. VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY, S/O. SANKAR REDDY, AGED 52 YEARS. CONTRACTOR, R/O. 16-12-105, FLAT NO.G1, GURU NILAYAM, HARANATHAPURAM, 3 RD STREET, SPSR NELLORE CITY AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SASI BUSAN KUMAR IAS, S/O. AYODHYA PRASAD, THE THEN PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (DURING COMPLIANCE PERIOD). IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT NOW WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. G SAI PRASAD IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 3. S S RAWAT IAD, THE THEN SECRETARY (DURING COMPLIANCE PERIOD). FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOW UNDER MEDICAL LEAVE AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 4. V VINAY CHAND IAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 5. P KRISHNA MOHAN, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 6. K NAGARAJU, RHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WRD, NELLORE CENTRAL DIVISION, NELLORE, PSR NELLORE DISTRIC 7. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI R 7 IMPLEDED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.21.11.2024. VIDE IA NO.1 OF 2024 IN CC NO.2980 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents in terms of Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 for wilfully disobeying/violating the orders of this Honourable Court passed in W.P.NO. 32835 of 2023, dated 11-01-2024 passed by Honourable Sri Justice VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Implead the Incumbent Officer/Peeyush Kumar as Party Respondent No.7 to the Contempt Case and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to recall the Bailable Warrant issued by this Hon'ble Court on 24.10.2025 against the Respondent No.4 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to recall the Bailable Warrant issued by this Hon'ble Court on 24.10.2025 against the Respondent No.3 and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to recall the bailable warrant issued by the Hon’ble Court on 24-10- 2025 against me in CC.No.2980 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAHUL REDDY CHAGANTI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 3. K M KRISHNA REDDY 4. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:2980/2024 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 11.01.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.32835 of 2023. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the orders dated 11.01.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.32835 of 2023 are complied with and also issued proceedings dated 18.11.2025 to that effect. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not refute the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents. Recording the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 18.11.2025 BSP 110 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.2980 of 2024 18.11.2025 BSP