Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56484 (CHH)

MAKHMOHAN v. MAHAMANI BAI and ORS.

SA/316/2011 · 2025-12-15

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:61385 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 316 of 2011 Makhmohan, S/o. Kishun Uraon, aged about 43 years, Caste-Uraon, Occupation-Agriculture, R/o. Village-Salekera, Tahsil-Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur (C.G.) …….. Appellant VERSUS 1. Mahamani Bai, D/o. Khasru Ram, aged about 45 years, Caste-Uraon, 2. Ku. Anjana, mother Mahamani Bai, aged about 24 years, Both R/o. Village Salekera, Tahsil and District Jashpur (C.G.) 3. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Collector, Jashpur, Dist. Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : None For Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Aman Upadhyay, Advocate For Respondent No.3/State : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 16/12/2025 1. It transpires from the order dated 10.10.2025 that, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant, when the matter was taken up for hearing in two rounds. Today, also when the matter is being called twice for hearing, no one appears on behalf of the appellant and no representation is made. VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.19 11:11:59 +0530 2 2. In view of the above, the present second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved