Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56483 (AP)

HLL LIFECARE LTD v. SRI. KONA SASIDHAR, IAS

CC/4608/2024 · 2025-11-24

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010523822024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4608/2024 Between: 1. HLL LIFECARE LTD, (A GOVT, OF INDIA ENTERPRISE) HAVING ITS REGISTERED/CORPORATE OFFICE AT HLL BHAWAN, POOJAPPURA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695012 ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI KONA SASIDHAR IAS, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SMT M JANAKI I A S, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. MR S SURESH KUMAR I A S, COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH, HAVING OFFICE AT IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, A.P ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents herein for gross violation of the order dated 26.06.2024 of this Hon’ble Court passed in the above W.P.No.5587/2024 under the provisions of Sec 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the presence of Respondent No.2 on 27-02-2025, as directed by this Hon’ble Court vide ordered dated 21-01-2025and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to discharge respondent no.3 from the present contempt proceedings in the interest of Justice and may be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VAKADA LAKSHMI MOUNICA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.4608 of 2024 ORDER: Sri Nikhilesh Krishnan, learned counsel representing learned counsel for petitioner, appeared virtually and submitted that order of this Court has been complied with. Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. If there is any objection with regard to payment, petitioner is at liberty to negotiate with the respondent authorities. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 25.11.2025 KBN 4 07 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.4608 of 2024 25.11.2025 KKBBNN