Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56482 (CAL)

SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED v. NITA PRAKASH HINDUJA

AP-COM/404/2025 · 2025-06-30

Shampa Sarkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OCD 23 ORDER SHEET AP-COM/404/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED VS NITA PRAKASH HINDUJA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHAMPA SARKAR Date: 30th June, 2025. Appearance: Mr. Swatarup Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Sariful Haque, Adv. Mr. Rajib Mullick, Adv. Ms. Sonia Mukherjee, Adv. …for the petitioner The Court: 1. Despite service, none appears on behalf of the respondent. On the last occasion, the Court directed substituted service. Substituted service has been effected. The insertion in two widely circulated dailies one in English and one in Gujarati has been made. 2. This is an application for extension of the mandate of the learned Arbitrator. The petitioner is the claimant. It is submitted that the mandate of the learned Arbitrator expired on 19th May, 2025. It is submitted that the respondent has not been appearing before the learned Arbitrator. The proceeding of the 9th sitting of the learned 2 Arbitrator records that the respondent was absent. Subsequent proceedings also indicate that none appeared on behalf of the respondent before the learned Arbitrator. It is submitted that the proceedings are at the stage of arguments. 3. Under such circumstances, the mandate of the learned Arbitrator is extended for a further period of one year from the date of communication of this order, to enable the learned Arbitrator to make and publish the award within the extended period. 4. Accordingly, AP-COM/404/2025 is disposed of. (SHAMPA SARKAR, J.) B.Pal