APHC010470692022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28644/2022 Between: 1. SRIRAM PARABHRAHMA CHARI,, S/O VEERESWARA CHARI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, PROFESSOR, R/O D.NO.11-410, PANDURANGA NAGAR, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522034 ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR SOUTH, GUNTUR. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NALLAPADU POLICE STATION, NALLAPADU, GUNTUR CITY. 5. SRI N BABAIAH, AUTOMALL BUSINESS HEAD, SHIRAM AUTOMALL INDIA, LTD (SAMIL) D.NO.103-42, HANUMAN NAGAR, ETUKUR ROAD, OPP. BHARATH PETROL BUNK, NH- 16, GUNTUR. 6. SRI GANGADHAR RAO, SALES MANAGER, SHIRAM AUTOMALL INDIA, LTD (SAMIL) D.NO.103-42, HANUMAN NAGAR, ETUKUR ROAD, OPP. BHARATH PETROL BUNK, NH-16, GUNTUR. 7. SRI RAMA KRISHNA, MANAGER, SHIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE, LAXMI COMPLEX, DOOR.NO.4/1, 5-37-4, 2ND 2 FLOOR, BRODIPET, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents 2 to 4 in taking action on the petitioner's representation dated 2.5.2022 submitted in Spandana as illegal, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take action basing on the petitioner's representations dated 2.5.2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SESHAGIRI RAO ULLAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. DODDALA PRUDHVI TEJA 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents 2 to 4 in taking action on the petitioner's representation dated 2.5.2022 submitted in Spandana as illegal, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take action basing on the petitioner's representations dated 2.5.2022 and pass ...” None represented for the Petitioner. Ms.A.Priyanka, learned counsel for respondent No.7 is in attendance. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that based on the Spandana Petition filed by the Petitioner before respondent No.2, respondent No.4 enquired into the matter and found that the dispute is purely a consumer dispute between the Petitioner and respondent No.7 and that no crime is registered and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*