APHC010002762002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 23653/2002 Between: 1. SHAHANAZ BEGUM @ SWARNALATHA, W/O LATE DR. MOHD YOUSUF R/O 7A-8-43, EASTERN STREET, KOTHA ROAD, ELURU, ...PETITIONER AND 1. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, SECRETARIATE BUILDING, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER FOR TRIBAL WELFARE, T.S. BHAVAN, MASABTANK, HYDERABAD. 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, INTERGRATED TRIBAL WELFARE AGENCY, KOTARAMCHANDRAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus - (i) Declaring the impugned proceeding No. 3054/1998 (C3) dated 2-10-2000 & even numbered Notification dated 6-10-2000, issued by the second respondent, and G.O.Ms. No.123 social Welfare (CV2) Department dated 14-11-2002, issued by the first respondent, as illegal arbitrary and set aside the same; (ii) consequently, declare that, petitioner is 2 entitled to be treated as a candidate belonging to scheduled tribe community, duly granting all other consequential relief and (iii) pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 29691 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Impugned Order No. 3054/1998 (C3) dated 2-10-2000 & Even Numbered Notification dated 6-10-2000, issued by second Respondent, and consequential Appellate order issued vide G.O.Ms.No. 123 dt 14-11-2002 by the first Respondent with a direction to continue the petitioner in service pending disposal of the above case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K VASUDEVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 21.08.2025 and 24.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting her case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP 4 186 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:23653 of 2002 Date: 25.09.2025 MP