- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32043 CRL.P No. 9569 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9569 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MUNIYAPPA @ UTTANALLAPPA, S/O. LATE. POOJAPPA., AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, 2. SRI. SUBRAMANI S/O MUNIYAPPA @ UTTANALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 3. SRI. HARISH S/O SUBRAMANI, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 4. SRI. CHANDRA S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.187, LAKSHMIPURA VILLAGE, YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 097. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VINOD S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY GANGAMMAGUDI POLICE STATION GANGAMMAGUDI CIRCLE, Digitally signed by NAGARAJA B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32043 CRL.P No. 9569 of 2025 BENGALURU (REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ) HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU. 2. SRI. N. PRAKASH, S/O NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/A. NO. 70-71, LAKSHMIPURA, VIDHYARANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 097. 3. SMT. LAKSHMI, W/O. G. DORAIRAJU., AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/A. NO.70, 29TH MAIN ROAD, 24TH CROSS, LAKSHMIPURA, VIDHYARANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU - 560 097. 4. SRI. GANESH, S/O. GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/A. NO.68, 2ND CROSS, SANJAYGANDHI NAGAR, 3RD BLOCK, 4TH BLOCK, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 079. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.R.PATIL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO 1. QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC.NO.12958/2025 PENDING BEFORE 49TH ACJM, AT BENGALURU. 2. TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 22.04.2025 PASSED BY THE 49TH ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.12958/2025. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32043 CRL.P No. 9569 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners, after vehemently argued the matter extensively, sought leave to withdraw the petition when this Court was not inclined to grant indulgence since there are sufficient materials to proceed against the petitioners. A memo is filed to that effect. 2. The said memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the above said memo, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. In view of the dismissal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2025 does not survive for consideration and the same is dismissed. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22