13-WP-71-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 71 OF 2025 (Shri Sanjay Shalik Tejne Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.) WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 930 OF 2024 (Namdev Mahadevrao Nandane Vs. V.G. Malpe) WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 936 OF 2024 (Sanjay s/o Shalikrao Tejane Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 71/2025 Mr. R.L. Kadu, Counsel for the petitioner. Ms N.R. Tripathi, A.P.P. for the respondents/State. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 930/2024 Mr. R.A. Bagde, Counsel for the petitioner. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 936/2024 Mr. S. Singha, Counsel for the petitioner (appointed). Ms N.R. Tripathi, A.P.P. for the respondents/State. ..... CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND M.M. NERLIKAR, JJ. JULY 28, 2025 The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 930/2024 has filed a Pursis stating therein that vide order dated 3/4/2025, Writ Petition No. 71/2025 came to be tagged with Writ Petition Nos. 930/2024 and 936/2024. 2] The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 930/2024 submits that his petition be de-tagged, wherein challenge was made to the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, which was later on affirmed by the Sessions Judge. 3] After having gone through the record, it appears that Writ Petition No. 930/2024 is filed before the Single Bench and it has no connection with the other two petitions. 13-WP-71-2025 2 4] Accordingly, Writ Petition No. 930/2024 is de-tagged. Registry to process accordingly. WRIT PETITION NO. 936/2024 5] Mr. S. Singha, learned Counsel for the petitioner (appointed), submits that since the petitioner has engaged Mr. R.L. Kadu, learned Counsel, in Writ Petition No. 71/2025, he may appear for the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 936/2024 as well. 6] The request, being reasonable, is accepted. Mr. S. Singha, learned Counsel, stands discharged. 7] Mr. R.L. Kadu, learned Counsel, submits that he is not pressing for orders in Writ Petition No. 936/2024. 8] Accordingly, Writ Petition No. 936/2024 is disposed of as not pressed for orders. 9] Fees of Mr. S. Singha, learned Counsel, appointed to represent the petitioner, be quantified and paid as per Rules. WRIT PETITION NO. 71/2025 10] List on 4/8/2025. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Sumit