Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56453 (CHH)

PRADEEP KUMAR AGRAWAL v. BIMAL KISHORE KHETAN

ARBA/21/2022 · 2025-07-03

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:30535-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ARBA No. 21 of 2022 1 - Pradeep Kumar Agrawal, S/o Late Shri R. V. Agrawal. Aged About 62 Years, Occupation-Business, R/o Kanha Kutir, South Avenue, Choubey Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Nutan Agrawal, W/o Shri Pradeep Kumar Agrawal, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Kanha Kutir, South Avenue, Choubey Colony Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Rahul Agrawal, S/o Late Shri S.K. Agrawal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o House No. 05, Royal Heaven, Dungaji Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Haldhari Lal Vyas, S/o Late Shri Gopal Lal Vyas, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Krishna Nagar, Danganiya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellants versus 1 - Bimal Kishore Khetan, S/o Shri Gouri Shankar Khetan, R/o B-3, Farista Complex, Rajbandha Maidan, Police Station Moudahapara, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Neha Khetan Residing At Farishta Complex, Flat B-3, GE Road, Nav Bharat Press, Rajbandi Maidan, Raipur -492001 3 - Sourav Tola, Residing At Flat No. 403, Green Meadows, Daldal Sconi, Near Kalyan Gas Godown, Shankar Nagar, Raipur 492007 4 - Saroj Devi Tola, Residing At Flat No. 403, Green Meadows, Daldal Sconi, Near Kalyan Gas Godown, Shankar Nagar, Raipur 492007 5 - Preeti Khetan, Residing At Flat No. 403, Green Meadows, Daldal Sconi, Near Kalyan Gas Godown, Shankar Nagar, Raipur 492007 ... Respondents PRASHANT DEWANGAN Digitally signed by PRASHANT DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.05 11:32:17 +0530 2 For Appellants : Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Manubha Shankar, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Harshwardhan Parganiha, Advocate D.B:-Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal, Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 04/07/2025 1. Learned Counsel for the appellants submits that during the pendency of this appeal, the matter has already been settled with the respondents, therefore, he does not want to press this appeal. 2. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE JUDGE Prashant