IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP Nos. 811 of 2025 a/w CWP Nos. 16253 to 16256, 16258, 16260 to 16262, 16264, 16265, 16268, 16270 of 2024 Decided on : 10.01.2025 1. CWP No. 811 of 2025 Ganesh. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 2. CWP No. 16253 of 2024 Kanchan Lata. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 3. CWP No. 16254 of 2024 Sakshi. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 2 4. CWP No. 16255 of 2024 Anoj Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 5. CWP No. 16256 of 2024 Mahinder Singh. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 6. CWP No. 16258 of 2024 Sunil Guleria. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 7. CWP No. 16260 of 2024 Om Parkash. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 3 8. CWP No. 16261 of 2024 Yashpal. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 9. CWP No. 16262 of 2024 Sukhvinder Singh and another. …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 10. CWP No. 16264 of 2024 Vivek Dhiman. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 11. CWP No. 16265 of 2024 Vinita. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 4 12. CWP No. 16268 of 2024 Chandresh Kumari. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 13. CWP No. 16270 of 2024 Subhash Chand and another. …Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Motta, Advocate, in all the petitions. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, in all the petitions. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. On the request of learned counsel for the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 5 petitioners, without making any observation on the merits of the case, these petitions are disposed of with the direction that let the representations, filed by the petitioners, be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein, within a period of six weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)