Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./43813/2025 · 2025-07-16
Anshuman
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56448 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56448 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43813 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2019 Thana- DHORAIYA District- Banka ====================================================== Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar Yadav S/O Alku Yadav R/O Village- Bahatra Jagatpur, P.S.- Naugachhiya, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Brij Nandan Prasad, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 2 16-07-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Dhoraiya P.S. Case No.105 of 2019 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against five named accused persons including the petitioner with allegation that accused persons came with iron rod, khanti and nut masket and started abusing. Upon protest, they assaulted the informant and his nephew due to which they become injured and fainted.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner is a son-in-law of the family and his name has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43813 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 unnecessarily been casted in the present case.
5. Learned Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioner is clean.
6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that it is a unique case in which FIR has been lodged in the year 2019 and he has moved for anticipatory bail in the year 2025.
7. From the record, it transpires that sessions trial has also been started bearing Sessions Trial No.482/19. Meaning thereby bifurcation of sessions trial has been made.
8. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
9. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioner, if he surrenders within 4 weeks from today and prays for regular bail, then trial court shall pass order on merit without being prejudice of the present
order preferably on the same day.
Prakashmani/- (Dr. Anshuman, J.) U T