Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 56448 (BOM)
SWAPNIL S/O PARSHRAM PAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PSO, PS, WASHIM CITY, DIST. WASHIM
APPP/2123/2025 · 2025-10-13
Vrushali V Joshi
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56448 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56448 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 appa 2123-2023.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPP) NO.2123/2025 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.845/2025 Swapnil s/o Parshram Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri D.G. Kale, Advocate for applicant Shri Anant Ghogare, APP for the State
CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 13.10.2025
1. The present application is filed for speaking to minutes. In this application, in the name of applicant, the name of father of applicant is wrongly mentioned in the operative order in prayer clause-(ii) is ‘Ramesh’ instead of ‘Parasram’.
2. Necessary correction be carried out and corrected
order be uploaded.
3. The application is disposed of accordingly.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI J.) R.S. Sahare