2025:UHC:6147 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 698 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Piyush Sammal, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Vicky’ S/o Dalveer is praying for bail in relation to First Information Report dated 06.12.2023 bearing FIR No. 0542 of 2023 P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar, wherein, the present applicant was implicated for the offence punishable under Section 363 of IPC and on completion of investigation the applicant was chargesheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and 376(3) of IPC r/w/ Section 5(l)/6 of POCSO Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and also submits that the chargesheet has already been filed on 24.01.2024 and as such there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant and not only this even the trial has been commenced and the victim has also been examined. He further submits that medical report also not fully support the case of the prosecution. He further submits that there are contradictions on the statement of the victim and the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.01.2024. He further submits that the applicant has no previous criminal history. He finally concluded his argument by saying that the applicant is suffered long incarceration since he is in jail from 12.01.2024 and the trial has yet not been concluded, therefore the applicant be enlarged on bail. 5. On the other side, learned Brief Holder Mr. Himanshu Sain have not disputed this fact that the trial has already been commenced and the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.01.2024 and as such there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant and furthermore the 2025:UHC:6147 applicant has no previous criminal history. 6. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the trial has already been commenced and the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.01.2024 and having no previous criminal history, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant ‘Vicky’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 15.07.2025 PR 2025:UHC:6147