APHC010396212016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5470/2016 Between: 1. M/S. GAJANANA DIGITAL CABLE NETWORK, ANANTAPURAM DIST, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR B. GANELH NAIDU, S/O. B. MANCHENA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. HINDUPUR ROAD, KALYANDURG, ANAILTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POSTS ANANTAPURAM DIST 3 OT, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 2. THE HEAD POSTMASTER HEAD POST OFFICE ANANTAPURARNU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE POSTMASTER GUNTAKAL HEAD OFFICE, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR KALYANDURG ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 3rd respondent in cancelling the license for operating the cable network in Kalyandurg area by memo No.H/Cable TV/DIgs./BBN/Guntakal/HO, dated 29-01-2016, consequently set aside the same, forth with, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 6956 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the memo No.H/Cable TV/DIgs./BBN/Guntakal/HO, dated 29-01-2016 issued by the 3rd Respondent, by continuing the petitioner to operate the cable network services, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2016(WPMP 32193 OF 2016 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 5 OF 2016(WPMP 61169 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NAMAVARAPU R RAO(CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 7th October, 2025 cbn 4 703 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.5470 of 2016 7th October, 2025 cbn