- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39294 RSA No. 336 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 336 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: L.M.SWAMY GOWDA SINCE DEAD BY LRS 1. SARASWATHI W/O LATE SWAMI GOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 2. KIRANKUMAR S/O LATE SWAMI GOWDA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 3. SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE SWAMI GOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/O LAXMISAGAR VILLAGE MELUKOTE HOBLI, TQ PANDAVAPUR, DIST MANDYA - 571 435. 4. SMT SHASHIKALA D/O LATE SWAMI GOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O DAMADAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, TQ PANDAVAPUR, DIST MANDYA - 571 435. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39294 RSA No. 336 of 2023 5. L M KRISHNAPPAGOWDA S/O MANCHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS 6. SMT CHIKKATHAYAMMA W/O DODDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS TQ PANDAVAPUR, DIST MANDYA - 571 435. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. LOKESH MALAVALLI, ADVOCATE) AND: MANCHEGOWDA SINCE DEAD BY LRS 1. SMT JAYAMMA W/O MANCHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 2. NAGEGOWDA S/O LATE MANCHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 3. SMT CHANNAMMA W/O LAKSHMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 4. L N JAGADEESHA S/O MALIGE NARASEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 5. SMT JAYAMMA W/O LATE JAVAREGOWDA, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39294 RSA No. 336 of 2023 AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 6. SWAMYGOWDA S/O KANTHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 7. CHIKKAKEMPAMMA W/O HANUMANTHE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT LAKSHMI VILLAGE MELUKOTE HOBLI, TQ PANDAVAPUR, DIST MANDYA - 571 435 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.10.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO. 10/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PANDAVAPURA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.01.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.39/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PANDAVAPURA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39294 RSA No. 336 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo for withdrawal. Memo reads as under: "In the above case, appellants seeks to leave this Hon’ble Court. Therefore, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the appellants to withdraw the above case in the interest of justice.” Placing the memo on record, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12 CT: BHK