APHC010308972025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1765/2025 Between: 1. B SIVAJI, S/O LATE BANGARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. SANGAMITHRA, R/O D.NO. 3-49, NOOLUKUNTA VILLAGE, KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHAGATHURU CHANDRASEKHAR, THE ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER, VELUGU, MAHILA MANDAL SAMIKYA, KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. MALAGIRI KRISHNA, THE COMMUNITY CO-ORDINATOR, VELUGU, DRDA OFFICE, KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Contemnors/respondents under Articles 215 of the Constitution of India and under the provisions of the Contempt of courts Act for wilfully, wantonly and flagrantly violating the order passed by this Hon'ble court in W.P.No.19920/2024 dt.20-9-2924, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to recall the Bailable warrant issued against the respondent Nos 1 and 2 on 11.09.2025 in C.C No. 1765 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. HARI BABU MAGULURI SC For SERP The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case has been filed, complaining of a violation of the order dated 20.09.2024, passed in W.P. No. 19920 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition complaining of the interference of respondents 4 & 5 in discharging duties as Sangamitra (Village Organisation Assistant) in the 6th respondent Society. 4. The said writ petition was disposed of on 20.09.2024. The operative portion of said order reads as follows: “Given the facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the aforementioned circular issued by the Principal Secretary, SERP, and the oral instructions furnished by the Project Director, DRDA, Chittoor District, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage, with the consent of the learned counsel on either side, directing the respondent Nos.4 and 5 not to interfere with the petitioner’s discharging duties as Sangamitra / VAO in Noolukunta Village, Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor District.” 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was pleaded that despite the said order, the respondents are interfering with the petitioner’s discharge of duties. 6. A counter-affidavit has been filed by respondent No.1, wherein it was pleaded that the petitioner has been continuing as VOA and the respondents are not interfering with the petitioner’s discharge of duties as VOA. Page 3 of 4 7. No rejoinder has been filed disputing the averments made in the counter-affidavit. 8. Thus, as seen from the averments made in the counter-affidavit, the respondents are not interfering with the petitioner’s discharge of duties as VOA. Hence, this Court does not find any violation of the order dated 20.09.2024, passed in W.P. No. 19920 of 2024. 9. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 05.12.2025 TVN 166 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.1765 OF 2025 Date: 05.12.2025 TVN