1 2025:CGHC:42540 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8296 of 2025 1 - Smt. Ranjana Sharma W/o Shri Satyadeep Sharma Aged About 45 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Kadar Block Bilha District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of School Education Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Block Education Officer Bilha District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. K.S. Saini, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 21-08-2025 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure P/1), whereby the petitioner has been posted from Govt. Primary School Deorikhurd, Block Bilha to Govt. Primary School Kadar, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur under the rationalization instructions. The said impugned order was Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 passed after declaring her surplus there. The petitioner moved her representation on 23.06.2025 to the respondents authorities which is still pending. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil