ABC (PROSECUTRIX) (PARTICULARS MENTIONED IN THE F.I.R.) v. DEEPAK MALLAH
ACQA/435/2018 · 2025-07-03
Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56420 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56420 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:30566-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 435 of 2018 Abc (Prosecutrix) (Particulars Mentioned In The F.I.R.)
... Appellant versus 1 - Deepak Mallah S/o Shri Raju Mallah Aged About 26 Years R/o- Shankar Ward, Mallahapara, Mungeli Police Station- Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Officer In-Charge, Police Station- City Kotwali, Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Appellant : None. For Respondent No.1 : None, though served. For State/ Respondent No.2 : Mr. Arpit Agrawal, Panel lawyer. Division Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justic
e Sanjay S. Agrawal &
Hon’ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 04.07.2025
1. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the Appellant even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Digitally signed by ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Date: 2025.07.05 12:35:34 +0530
2
2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this appeal for non- prosecution.
3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Arpan